Crossword-Solution: TYPOGRAPHIC
Dictionary
| Word | Word Type | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Typographic | a. | Alt. of Typographical |
We have 2 clues for the answer “TYPOGRAPHIC”
| Clue | Answers |
|---|---|
| relating to typography, the art of printing or using type | 1 answer |
| Like some errors | 5 answers |
✏️ Suggest another clue
Know another question for crossword solution "TYPOGRAPHIC"? Please add your clue to the biggest crossword databank now!
Kind of apple
?
E
?
A
?
T
?
E
?
R
Hint 1 meaning
One who, or that which, eats.
Hint 2 anagram
RAETE
Hint 3 another clue
greedy person
6 +1
New Suggestion for "TYPOGRAPHIC"
Related word tools
Sentences with TYPOGRAPHIC (5)
From the usual typographic convention employed for these (smaller font at an extra indent), there derived the notation of included text being indented by one ASCII TAB (0001001) character, which under UNIX and many other environments gives the appearance of an 8-space indent.
Charles Wilkins had made the first direct translation from the Sanskrit into English in 1785, when he published in London The Bhagavat-Geeta or Dialogue of Krishna and Arjoon, and his is the imperishable honour thus chronicled by a contemporary poetaster:-- "But he performed a yet more noble part, He gave to Asia typographic art." In Bengali Halhed had printed at Hoogli in 1783, with types cut by Wilkins, the first grammar, but it had become obsolete and was imperfect.
From the usual typographic convention employed for these (smaller font at an extra indent), there derived a practice of included text being indented by one ASCII TAB (0001001) character, which under Unix and many other environments gives the appearance of an 8-space indent.
Either the reader knows Arabic, in which case Greek letters, italics and "upper case," diacritical points and similar typographic oddities are, as a rule with some exceptions, unnecessary; or he does not know Arabic, when none of these expedients will be of the least use to him.
This form, "situate," may be Pater's archaism for situated, or it may simply be a typographic error in the original published edition.